linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86 boot: allow overlapping ebda and efi memmap memory ranges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4856AE64.7020906@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:18:12 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, steiner@....com, travis@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86 boot: allow overlapping ebda and efi memmap memory
 ranges

Paul Jackson wrote:
> Yinghai wrote:
>> like to see to make reserve_ebda_region() more smart like the old
>> way when andi introduced ebda_size... instead of reserve 0x9000 to
>> 0x100000 all the way.
> 
> Looking back at some older kernels, that code seems to have setup an
> ebda region only if there was a non-zero real mode pointer at 0x40E.
> 
> This is rather different than always setting up such a region.
> 

Well, sort of.  Only some very old systems will not have had one.

0x40E contains the pointer to the EBDA; this basically tests for the 
existence of an EBDA at all.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/