| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <4856A365.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:31:17 -0600
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:22 PM, in message
<1213647746.3223.73.camel@...py.programming.kicks-ass.net>, Peter Zijlstra
<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> It came to my attention that we violate the SCHED_FIFO spec when
> un-boosting tasks in that we should move them to the head of the lower
> priority queue instead of to the tail.
>
> [1]
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_08.html#ta
> g_02_08_04_01
> [2]
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pthread_mutexattr_set
> protocol.html
>
> Also, while doing this patch, I noticed that the rt-group code further
> violates the spec by re-ordering the upper level entries. Any bright
> ideas? - if not I'll probably attempt the brute force method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Reviewed by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index c5d3f84..0db49d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -888,11 +888,16 @@ struct uts_namespace;
> struct rq;
> struct sched_domain;
>
> +#define ENQUEUE_WAKEUP 0x01
> +#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x02
> +
> +#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01
> +
> struct sched_class {
> const struct sched_class *next;
>
> - void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> - void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
> + void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
> + void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
> void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index eaf6751..f594f17 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static const u32 prio_to_wmult[40] = {
> /* 15 */ 119304647, 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153,
> };
>
> -static void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> +static void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
>
> /*
> * runqueue iterator, to support SMP load-balancing between different
> @@ -1542,16 +1542,16 @@ static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
> p->se.load.inv_weight = prio_to_wmult[p->static_prio - MAX_RT_PRIO];
> }
>
> -static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> +static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> {
> sched_info_queued(p);
> - p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, wakeup);
> + p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
> p->se.on_rq = 1;
> }
>
> -static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> +static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> {
> - p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
> + p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
> p->se.on_rq = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1604,24 +1604,24 @@ static int effective_prio(struct task_struct *p)
> /*
> * activate_task - move a task to the runqueue.
> */
> -static void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> +static void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> {
> if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
> rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
>
> - enqueue_task(rq, p, wakeup);
> + enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
> inc_nr_running(p, rq);
> }
>
> /*
> * deactivate_task - remove a task from the runqueue.
> */
> -static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> +static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> flags)
> {
> if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
> rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
>
> - dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
> + dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
> dec_nr_running(p, rq);
> }
>
> @@ -2143,7 +2143,7 @@ out_activate:
> else
> schedstat_inc(p, se.nr_wakeups_remote);
> update_rq_clock(rq);
> - activate_task(rq, p, 1);
> + activate_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> success = 1;
>
> out_running:
> @@ -4170,7 +4170,7 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
> if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)))
> prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> else
> - deactivate_task(rq, prev, 1);
> + deactivate_task(rq, prev, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
> switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
> }
>
> @@ -4525,7 +4525,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sleep_on_timeout);
> void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - int oldprio, on_rq, running;
> + int oldprio, on_rq, running, down;
> struct rq *rq;
> const struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
>
> @@ -4547,12 +4547,13 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int
> prio)
> else
> p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
>
> + down = (prio > p->prio) ? ENQUEUE_HEAD : 0;
> p->prio = prio;
>
> if (running)
> p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
> if (on_rq) {
> - enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
> + enqueue_task(rq, p, down);
>
> check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio, running);
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 08ae848..b545eeb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -847,10 +847,11 @@ hrtick_start_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
> * then put the task into the rbtree:
> */
> -static void enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> wakeup)
> +static void enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> flags)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> + int wakeup = flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
>
> for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> if (se->on_rq)
> @@ -868,10 +869,11 @@ static void enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> * decreased. We remove the task from the rbtree and
> * update the fair scheduling stats:
> */
> -static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> sleep)
> +static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> flags)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> + int sleep = flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
>
> for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> index 3a4f92d..0819086 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_idle(struct rq
> *rq)
> * message if some code attempts to do it:
> */
> static void
> -dequeue_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> +dequeue_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> {
> spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
> printk(KERN_ERR "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!\n");
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index 3432d57..0134f7c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct
> sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> return rt_se->my_q;
> }
>
> -static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se);
> +static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int flags);
> static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se);
>
> static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> if (rt_se && !on_rt_rq(rt_se) && rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
> struct task_struct *curr = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->curr;
>
> - enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> + enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, 0);
> if (rt_rq->highest_prio < curr->prio)
> resched_task(curr);
> }
> @@ -449,16 +449,21 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct
> rt_rq *rt_rq)
> #endif
> }
>
> -static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> +static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int flags)
> {
> struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
> struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
> struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
> + struct list_head *queue = array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se);
>
> if (group_rq && rt_rq_throttled(group_rq))
> return;
>
> - list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se));
> + if (unlikely(flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD))
> + list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> + else
> + list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> +
> __set_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
>
> inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
> @@ -499,29 +504,35 @@ static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct task_struct *p)
> /*
> * Adding/removing a task to/from a priority array:
> */
> -static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> wakeup)
> +static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> flags)
> {
> struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
>
> - if (wakeup)
> + if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
> rt_se->timeout = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * XXX: destroys queue order, how to fix?
> + */
> dequeue_rt_stack(p);
>
> /*
> * enqueue everybody, bottom - up.
> */
> for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
> - enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> + enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD);
> }
>
> -static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> +static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> flags)
> {
> struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
> struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
>
> update_curr_rt(rq);
>
> + /*
> + * XXX: destroys queue order, how to fix?
> + */
> dequeue_rt_stack(p);
>
> /*
> @@ -530,7 +541,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int sleep)
> for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
> rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
> if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> - enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> + enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, 0);
> }
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists