[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080616223402.6ad2365c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:34:02 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaswinder@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip2: use request_firmware()
O> This separation certainly does not make things _easier_ for users, our
> reason for existence. This separation certainly does not make it easier
> to drop in a driver with a firmware, i.e. not easier on driver
> developers. It is one more PITA detail when copying a driver from one
> kernel to another, or shipping the driver out of tree.
Users run distributions. The user picture is "I installed it, it worked".
> There are good reasons why the Makefile rules, Kconfig rules, C source
> code and headers for a driver all live together... moving the firmware
But they don't. Half the headers are in include/, random bits of glue are
scattered around the scripts dir.
> I like the goal, but see little effort in the area of "make this
> transition painless for users."
I think we need to think about "for the technically competent and distro
builders". I don't see any connection between the choice of firmware
source directory and users at all. They typed make, magic occurred.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists