linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.26-rc6] x86-32: fix boot failure on TSC-less processors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080616065802.GA24421@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:58:02 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26-rc6] x86-32: fix boot failure on TSC-less
	processors


* Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> wrote:

> Booting 2.6.26-rc6 on my 486 DX/4 fails with a "BUG: Int 6" (invalid 
> opcode) and a kernel halt immediately after the kernel has been 
> uncompressed. The BUG shows EIP pointing to an rdtsc instruction in 
> native_read_tsc(), invoked from native_sched_clock().
> 
> (This error occurs so early that not even the serial console can 
> capture it.)
> 
> A bisection showed that this bug first occurs in 2.6.26-rc3-git7, via 
> commit 9ccc906c97e34fd91dc6aaf5b69b52d824386910:
> 
> >x86: distangle user disabled TSC from unstable
> >
> >tsc_enabled is set to 0 from the command line switch "notsc" and from
> >the mark_tsc_unstable code. Seperate those functionalities and replace
> >tsc_enable with tsc_disable. This makes also the native_sched_clock()
> >decision when to use TSC understandable.
> >
> >Preparatory patch to solve the sched_clock() issue on 32 bit.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> The core reason for this bug is that native_sched_clock() gets
> called before tsc_init().
> 
> Before the commit above, tsc_32.c used a "tsc_enabled" variable
> which defaulted to 0 == disabled, and which only got enabled late
> in tsc_init(). Thus early calls to native_sched_clock() would skip
> the TSC and use jiffies instead.
> 
> After the commit above, tsc_32.c uses a "tsc_disabled" variable
> which defaults to 0, meaning that the TSC is Ok to use. Early calls
> to native_sched_clock() now erroneously try to use the TSC on
> !cpu_has_tsc processors, leading to invalid opcode exceptions.
> 
> My proposed fix is to initialise tsc_disabled to a "soft disabled"
> state distinct from the hard disabled state set up by the "notsc"
> kernel option. This fixes the native_sched_clock() problem. It also
> allows tsc_init() to be simplified: instead of setting tsc_disabled = 1
> on every error return, we just set tsc_disabled = 0 once when all
> checks have succeeded.
> 
> I've verified that this lets my 486 boot again. I've also verified 
> that a Core2 machine still uses the TSC as clocksource after the 
> patch.

applied to tip/x86/urgent - thanks Mikael! The soft-disabled state is a 
pretty good solution.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/