[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080617144526.GA28448@logfs.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:45:26 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Maxim Shchetynin <maxim@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AZFS file system proposal
On Tue, 17 June 2008 16:06:28 +0200, Maxim Shchetynin wrote:
> >
> > My personal question when looking at this is: Why not use ext2? It
>
> Same reason we don't use ext2 for file system in RAM - we don't need any expensive caching and readahead mechanisms for devices which are as fast as main memory (or almost as fast).
Well, with the '-o xip' option I mentioned below, there is no caching or
readahead. The direct_access method you use as well was developed for
ext2. Or rather for xip2fs, another new filesystem. After some review,
that was shot down and a mount option was added to ext2 instead.
> > appears to me that an ext2 mounted with '-o xip' would solve the same
> > problems.
Jörn
--
Homo Sapiens is a goal, not a description.
-- unknown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists