[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213730922.8707.57.camel@lts-notebook>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:28:42 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] fix kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:719! in
2.6.26-rc5-mm3
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 19:33 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> >
> > Now I wonder if the assertion that newpage count == 1 could be violated?
> > I don't see how. We've just allocated and filled it and haven't
> > unlocked it yet, so we should hold the only reference. Do you agree?
>
> Disagree: IIRC, excellent example of the kind of assumption
> that becomes invalid with Nick's speculative page references.
>
> Someone interested in the previous use of the page may have
> incremented the refcount, and in due course will find that
> it's got reused for something else, and will then back off.
>
Yeah. Kosaki-san mentioned that we'd need some rework for the
speculative page cache work. Looks like we'll need to drop the
VM_BUG_ON().
I need to go read up on the new invariants we can trust with the
speculative page cache.
Thanks,
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists