linux-kernel - Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <485816B3.3080800@am.sony.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:55:31 -0700
From:	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
CC:	linux-embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel

Tim Bird wrote:
>> If you want an explicit trigger, you could either hook into init_post()
>> or have hooks in the open functions of drivers with deferred
>> initialization.
> 
> This would presumably require multiple calls (one to the open of
> each deferred module).  I would still need a trigger for the memory
> free operation, unless I hardcode the order of the opening and just
> "know" that the last one should free the memory.  I'll have to see
> if all the modules being loaded like this have open()s.

Sorry - I responded too quickly.  I'm not sure I follow the
original suggestion.  How would I call the open function of
a module that is not initialized yet?
 -- Tim

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/