[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806171421100.2907@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Mueller <robm@...tmail.fm>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: BUG: mmapfile/writev spurious zero bytes (x86_64/not i386,
bisected, reproducable)
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> If that fixes anything:
> - The caller is broken because it shouldn't pass a faulting source to copy_to_user()
> - And you broken copy_from_user error reporting which shares the same code
Andi, I'm sorry I cc'd you. You are the author of that crap, but the bug
seems to be that you never even understood what copy_from_user() is
supposed to do.
The whole *and*only* reason for copy_to/from_user() existing AT ALL is
exactly the fact that the source or destination access can fault.
I don't really see why you continually start arguing about things that are
OBVIOUSLY BUGGY, as if they weren't buggy. Once somebody has debugged a
buggy routine, you shouldn't argue against it.
So here's a hint: next time I claim some code of yours is buggy, either
just acknowledge the bug, or stay silent. You'll look smarter that way.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists