[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080617231334.GK21814@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:13:34 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] xen: don't drop NX bit
* Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 03:01:56PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > When converting the pfn/mfn in a pagetable entry, make sure we mask
> > out the protection flags properly. Formerly, this code was losing the
> > NX bit, and not dealing with extra Xen-defined software flags in ptes.
> >
> > Because NX is now enforced properly, we must put the hypercall page
> > into the .text segment so that it is executable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> > Cc: Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>
>
> While it's great that you tell the stable people about this, but is it
> realistic? Is anyone using Xen as contained in the mainline kernel
> these days?
>
> If a distro were to be based on 2.6.25 and we take this patch, they will
> just revert it back out due to their very large Xen patchset they apply
> on top to get a "working" Xen version, right?
Fedora uses proper pv-ops for Xen. It's a good -stable candidate.
Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists