lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, vgusev@...nvz.org, mcmanus@...ksong.com,
	xemul@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TCP]: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT causes leak sockets

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:26:58 +0200

> So since there's no clear bug pattern and no sure reproducability on my 
> side i'd suggest we track this problem separately and "do nothing" right 
> now. I've excluded this warning from my 'is the freshly booted kernel 
> buggy' list of conditions of -tip testing so it's not holding me up.

I'm going to push the revert through just to be safe and I think it's
a good idea to do so because all of those defer accept changes should
be resubmitted as a group for 2.6.27

> and i can apply any test-patch if that would be helpful - if it does a 
> WARN_ON() i'll notice it. (pure extra debug printks with no stack trace 
> are much harder to notice in automated tests)

I don't have time to work on your bug, sorry.  Someone else will
have to step forward and help you with it.

FWIW I don't think your TX timeout problem has anything to do with
packet ordering.  The TX element of the network device is totally
stateless, but it's hanging under some set of circumstances to the
point where we timeout and reset the hardware to get it going again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ