[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213696004.26255.960.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:46:44 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sam@...nborg.org, dhowells@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...il.com>,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
linux-m32r@...linux-m32r.org, kyle@...artin.ca, matthew@....cx,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:42 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Why _are_ there architectures which define ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT and have
> > <asm/a.out.h> but don't support binfmt_aout, anyway? How does that make
> > sense?
>
> My guess would be that binfmt_aout isn't actually used there.
>
> The affected architectures are:
> - h8300
> - m32r
> - parisc
> - sh
> - v850
>
> v850 is broken beyond repair, and I hope my patch to remove the
> architecture will make it into 2.6.27.
>
> For the other 4 architectures I have Cc'ed the architecture maintainers.
There's another set of architectures which have <asm/a.out.h> but don't
define ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT. Including PowerPC.
I think we can probably get away with removing <asm/a.out.h> from every
architecture other than Alpha, ARM, m68k and x86, and killing
ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT completely.
Or maybe, as dhowells suggests, re-defining ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT to be set
only on Alpha, ARM, m68k and x86 (so BINFMT_AOUT can depend on it).
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists