linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v2] Implement thermal limiting in the generic thermal class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080618095646.GA20079@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:56:46 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trenn@...e.de
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Implement thermal limiting in the generic thermal class

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:28:01PM +0800, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> One thing I'm concerning is that if we could enable polling in Linux.
> Bug #8842 shows that polling may break some laptops.
> And we have known that windows never enable polling.
> Although this patch will not break the laptop in #8842, it still may
> bring some potential risks if we enable polling in Linux.
> IMO, a dmi entry would be much more acceptable...

If it breaks anything, we can revisit the decision. I'd be surprised if 
it did.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/