[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080618103006.GF15255@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:30:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: more header fixes
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Summary: Add missing include guards for some x86 headers.
applied to tip/x86/cleanups, thanks Vegard.
> This has only had the most rudimentary testing, but is hopefully
> obviously correct. (That's just doomed to generate some sort of build
> failure, isn't it?)
heh ;-)
> PS: I now have a pretty cool framework in Perl for parsing and
> checking headers. And it can be used to transform them automatically
> too. So if you want to standardize the guard format of all the headers
> in one go, we have the means to do it quickly and efficiently...
very nice! I think the reference should be something like the unified
include/asm-x86/processor.h.
could you try a run with that and put the result into a git tree for me
to pull for review? I think we want to finetune that result and do a
flag day for those cleanups, right after all the x86 topics went into
v2.6.27.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists