[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080618122931.GB12763@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:29:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SGI UV: TLB shootdown using broadcast assist unit
* Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com> wrote:
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
>
> TLB shootdown for SGI UV.
>
> This patch brings v1 up to v5.
applied to tip/x86/uv, thanks Cliff.
Note that i've done a few minor cleanups as well in that branch (see the
patch below). The code could still be improved.
Found a potential security hole while doing that:
static ssize_t uv_ptc_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user,
size_t count, loff_t *data)
{
long newmode;
char optstr[64];
if (copy_from_user(optstr, user, count))
return -EFAULT;
is count guaranteed to never be larger than 64?
Ingo
---------------->
commit b007179c763655806671ac173ae5dbe1d4fa70ae
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Wed Jun 18 14:28:19 2008 +0200
SGI UV: clean up arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
index d8705e9..7bdbf67 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
@@ -11,19 +11,22 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
-#include <asm/idle.h>
-#include <asm/genapic.h>
-#include <asm/uv/uv_hub.h>
#include <asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h>
+#include <asm/uv/uv_hub.h>
#include <asm/uv/uv_bau.h>
+#include <asm/genapic.h>
+#include <asm/idle.h>
#include <asm/tsc.h>
#include <mach_apic.h>
-static struct bau_control **uv_bau_table_bases __read_mostly;
-static int uv_bau_retry_limit __read_mostly;
-static int uv_nshift __read_mostly; /* position of pnode (which is nasid>>1) */
-static unsigned long uv_mmask __read_mostly;
+static struct bau_control **uv_bau_table_bases __read_mostly;
+static int uv_bau_retry_limit __read_mostly;
+
+/* position of pnode (which is nasid>>1): */
+static int uv_nshift __read_mostly;
+
+static unsigned long uv_mmask __read_mostly;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ptc_stats, ptcstats);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bau_control, bau_control);
@@ -37,8 +40,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bau_control, bau_control);
* be sent (the hardware will only do one reply per message).
*/
static void uv_reply_to_message(int resource,
- struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg,
- struct bau_msg_status *msp)
+ struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg,
+ struct bau_msg_status *msp)
{
unsigned long dw;
@@ -55,11 +58,11 @@ static void uv_reply_to_message(int resource,
* Other cpu's may come here at the same time for this message.
*/
static void uv_bau_process_message(struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg,
- int msg_slot, int sw_ack_slot)
+ int msg_slot, int sw_ack_slot)
{
- int cpu;
unsigned long this_cpu_mask;
struct bau_msg_status *msp;
+ int cpu;
msp = __get_cpu_var(bau_control).msg_statuses + msg_slot;
cpu = uv_blade_processor_id();
@@ -96,11 +99,11 @@ static void uv_bau_process_message(struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg,
*/
static int uv_examine_destination(struct bau_control *bau_tablesp, int sender)
{
- int i;
- int j;
- int count = 0;
struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg;
struct bau_msg_status *msp;
+ int count = 0;
+ int i;
+ int j;
for (msg = bau_tablesp->va_queue_first, i = 0; i < DEST_Q_SIZE;
msg++, i++) {
@@ -111,7 +114,7 @@ static int uv_examine_destination(struct bau_control *bau_tablesp, int sender)
i, msg->address, msg->acknowledge_count,
msg->number_of_cpus);
for (j = 0; j < msg->number_of_cpus; j++) {
- if (!((long)1 << j & msp-> seen_by.bits)) {
+ if (!((1L << j) & msp->seen_by.bits)) {
count++;
printk("%d ", j);
}
@@ -135,8 +138,7 @@ static int uv_examine_destinations(struct bau_target_nodemask *distribution)
int count = 0;
sender = smp_processor_id();
- for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(struct bau_target_nodemask) * BITSPERBYTE);
- i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct bau_target_nodemask) * BITSPERBYTE; i++) {
if (!bau_node_isset(i, distribution))
continue;
count += uv_examine_destination(uv_bau_table_bases[i], sender);
@@ -217,11 +219,11 @@ int uv_flush_send_and_wait(int cpu, int this_blade, struct bau_desc *bau_desc,
{
int completion_status = 0;
int right_shift;
- int bit;
- int blade;
int tries = 0;
- unsigned long index;
+ int blade;
+ int bit;
unsigned long mmr_offset;
+ unsigned long index;
cycles_t time1;
cycles_t time2;
@@ -294,7 +296,7 @@ int uv_flush_send_and_wait(int cpu, int this_blade, struct bau_desc *bau_desc,
* Returns 0 if some remote flushing remains to be done.
*/
int uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t *cpumaskp, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long va)
+ unsigned long va)
{
int i;
int bit;
@@ -356,12 +358,12 @@ int uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t *cpumaskp, struct mm_struct *mm,
*/
void uv_bau_message_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct bau_payload_queue_entry *pqp;
- struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg;
struct bau_payload_queue_entry *va_queue_first;
struct bau_payload_queue_entry *va_queue_last;
+ struct bau_payload_queue_entry *msg;
struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
- cycles_t time1, time2;
+ cycles_t time1;
+ cycles_t time2;
int msg_slot;
int sw_ack_slot;
int fw;
@@ -376,13 +378,14 @@ void uv_bau_message_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
local_pnode = uv_blade_to_pnode(uv_numa_blade_id());
- pqp = va_queue_first = __get_cpu_var(bau_control).va_queue_first;
+ va_queue_first = __get_cpu_var(bau_control).va_queue_first;
va_queue_last = __get_cpu_var(bau_control).va_queue_last;
+
msg = __get_cpu_var(bau_control).bau_msg_head;
while (msg->sw_ack_vector) {
count++;
fw = msg->sw_ack_vector;
- msg_slot = msg - pqp;
+ msg_slot = msg - va_queue_first;
sw_ack_slot = ffs(fw) - 1;
uv_bau_process_message(msg, msg_slot, sw_ack_slot);
@@ -484,7 +487,7 @@ static int uv_ptc_seq_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
* >0: retry limit
*/
static ssize_t uv_ptc_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user,
- size_t count, loff_t *data)
+ size_t count, loff_t *data)
{
long newmode;
char optstr[64];
@@ -587,42 +590,48 @@ static struct bau_control * __init uv_table_bases_init(int blade, int node)
bau_tabp =
kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bau_control), GFP_KERNEL, node);
BUG_ON(!bau_tabp);
+
bau_tabp->msg_statuses =
kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bau_msg_status) *
DEST_Q_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL, node);
BUG_ON(!bau_tabp->msg_statuses);
+
for (i = 0, msp = bau_tabp->msg_statuses; i < DEST_Q_SIZE; i++, msp++)
bau_cpubits_clear(&msp->seen_by, (int)
uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(blade));
+
bau_tabp->watching =
kmalloc_node(sizeof(int) * DEST_NUM_RESOURCES, GFP_KERNEL, node);
BUG_ON(!bau_tabp->watching);
- for (i = 0, ip = bau_tabp->watching; i < DEST_Q_SIZE; i++, ip++) {
+
+ for (i = 0, ip = bau_tabp->watching; i < DEST_Q_SIZE; i++, ip++)
*ip = 0;
- }
+
uv_bau_table_bases[blade] = bau_tabp;
+
return bau_tabsp;
}
/*
* finish the initialization of the per-blade control structures
*/
-static void __init uv_table_bases_finish(int blade, int node, int cur_cpu,
- struct bau_control *bau_tablesp,
- struct bau_desc *adp)
+static void __init
+uv_table_bases_finish(int blade, int node, int cur_cpu,
+ struct bau_control *bau_tablesp,
+ struct bau_desc *adp)
{
- int i;
struct bau_control *bcp;
+ int i;
- for (i = cur_cpu; i < (cur_cpu + uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(blade));
- i++) {
+ for (i = cur_cpu; i < cur_cpu + uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(blade); i++) {
bcp = (struct bau_control *)&per_cpu(bau_control, i);
- bcp->bau_msg_head = bau_tablesp->va_queue_first;
- bcp->va_queue_first = bau_tablesp->va_queue_first;
- bcp->va_queue_last = bau_tablesp->va_queue_last;
- bcp->watching = bau_tablesp->watching;
- bcp->msg_statuses = bau_tablesp->msg_statuses;
- bcp->descriptor_base = adp;
+
+ bcp->bau_msg_head = bau_tablesp->va_queue_first;
+ bcp->va_queue_first = bau_tablesp->va_queue_first;
+ bcp->va_queue_last = bau_tablesp->va_queue_last;
+ bcp->watching = bau_tablesp->watching;
+ bcp->msg_statuses = bau_tablesp->msg_statuses;
+ bcp->descriptor_base = adp;
}
}
@@ -643,14 +652,18 @@ uv_activation_descriptor_init(int node, int pnode)
adp = (struct bau_desc *)
kmalloc_node(16384, GFP_KERNEL, node);
BUG_ON(!adp);
+
pa = __pa((unsigned long)adp);
n = pa >> uv_nshift;
m = pa & uv_mmask;
+
mmr_image = uv_read_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_LB_BAU_SB_DESCRIPTOR_BASE);
- if (mmr_image)
+ if (mmr_image) {
uv_write_global_mmr64(pnode, (unsigned long)
UVH_LB_BAU_SB_DESCRIPTOR_BASE,
(n << UV_DESC_BASE_PNODE_SHIFT | m));
+ }
+
for (i = 0, ad2 = adp; i < UV_ACTIVATION_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE; i++, ad2++) {
memset(ad2, 0, sizeof(struct bau_desc));
ad2->header.sw_ack_flag = 1;
@@ -669,16 +682,17 @@ uv_activation_descriptor_init(int node, int pnode)
/*
* initialize the destination side's receiving buffers
*/
-static struct bau_payload_queue_entry * __init uv_payload_queue_init(int node,
- int pnode, struct bau_control *bau_tablesp)
+static struct bau_payload_queue_entry * __init
+uv_payload_queue_init(int node, int pnode, struct bau_control *bau_tablesp)
{
- char *cp;
struct bau_payload_queue_entry *pqp;
+ char *cp;
pqp = (struct bau_payload_queue_entry *) kmalloc_node(
(DEST_Q_SIZE + 1) * sizeof(struct bau_payload_queue_entry),
GFP_KERNEL, node);
BUG_ON(!pqp);
+
cp = (char *)pqp + 31;
pqp = (struct bau_payload_queue_entry *)(((unsigned long)cp >> 5) << 5);
bau_tablesp->va_queue_first = pqp;
@@ -694,6 +708,7 @@ static struct bau_payload_queue_entry * __init uv_payload_queue_init(int node,
(unsigned long)
uv_physnodeaddr(bau_tablesp->va_queue_last));
memset(pqp, 0, sizeof(struct bau_payload_queue_entry) * DEST_Q_SIZE);
+
return pqp;
}
@@ -756,6 +771,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
uv_bau_table_bases = (struct bau_control **)
kmalloc(nblades * sizeof(struct bau_control *), GFP_KERNEL);
BUG_ON(!uv_bau_table_bases);
+
last_blade = -1;
for_each_online_node(node) {
blade = uv_node_to_blade_id(node);
@@ -767,6 +783,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
}
set_intr_gate(UV_BAU_MESSAGE, uv_bau_message_intr1);
uv_enable_timeouts();
+
return 0;
}
__initcall(uv_bau_init);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists