linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:28:49 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	"Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:15:08 -0400
"Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com> wrote:

> I applied the following patches from 2.6-26-rc5-mm3

> 
> I am on an x86_64. I dont know what other info you need...
> 

if it's locking related, enabling LOCKDEP is a first good test to do.

CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
as well as the various spinlock/mutex lock debug questions



-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/