[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080618142849.13e90c6d@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:28:49 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:15:08 -0400
"Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com> wrote:
> I applied the following patches from 2.6-26-rc5-mm3
>
> I am on an x86_64. I dont know what other info you need...
>
if it's locking related, enabling LOCKDEP is a first good test to do.
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
as well as the various spinlock/mutex lock debug questions
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists