[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806181610.21017.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:10:20 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Mueller <robm@...tmail.fm>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: BUG: mmapfile/writev spurious zero bytes (x86_64/not i386, bisected, reproducable)
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 07:46, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> So the patch _fixes_ copy_from_user(), exactly because it says that even
> if you've loaded 24 bytes, but you faulted on the fourth load, you've
> still _copied_ exactly zero bytes, because you didn't actually store the
> 24 bytes you loaded.
Yes, the new filemap.c code does not require an exact byte count, but
it won't work if there is an under-estimation of the number of bytes
left to copy.
The old filemap.c code actually also relies on the byte count in some
cases, I can't remember off the top of my head, but I *think* it was a
security measure to prevent uninitialized data leak.
Most other cases of course only care about complete success or not, but
there are others. filemap_xip, splice are a couple that pop up.
Thanks for working that all out before I even read my email :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists