lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:24:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > Along the lines of: Hell no. There's a reason we have a special set_wrprotect() thing. We can do it more efficiently on native hardware by just clearing the bit atomically. No need to do the cmpxchg games. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists