[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080619103051.GH15228@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:30:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] SGI UV: TLB shootdown using broadcast assist unit -
v5 delta
* Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com> wrote:
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
>
> TLB shootdown for SGI UV.
>
> This patch brings the code in Ingo's latest (June 18,2008) to v5
>
> v1: 6/2 original
> v2: 6/3 corrections/improvements per Ingo's review
> v3: 6/4 split atomic operations off to a separate patch (Jeremy's review)
> v4: 6/12 include <mach_apic.h> rather than <asm/mach-bigsmp/mach_apic.h>
> (fixes a !SMP build problem)
> fix the index on uv_table_bases[blade]
> v5: 6/18 corrections/improvements per Ingo's second and third reviews
> (includes closing the security hole in uv_ptc_proc_write())
> (and adds tlb_uv.o to the Makefile)
>
> Diffed against 2.6.26-rc6
could you please send a delta patch against tip/x86/uv - or just
tip/master? You can pick it all up from:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
it's better to have all these delta patches in a consecutive way, as
everything up to your previous version of v5 has already been tested
pretty thoroughly on non-UV hardware and is ready to be pushed into
linux-next.
I'd suggest you name the new delta patch as v6, as there's a "v5" patch
applied already.
( Also, you might want to check whether tip/master properly works on
your simulator - to double-check whether the integration of x86/uv
changes with other x86 changes went fine. )
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists