lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48f7fe350806190745u1b78ae61ue8e71619db5756f7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:45:43 -0400
From:	"Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com>
To:	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO

Well enabling these debug options is sorta useless because once it
hardlocks I cant see or do anything..

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:15:08 -0400
> "Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> I applied the following patches from 2.6-26-rc5-mm3
>
>>
>> I am on an x86_64. I dont know what other info you need...
>>
>
> if it's locking related, enabling LOCKDEP is a first good test to do.
>
> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
> as well as the various spinlock/mutex lock debug questions
>
>
>
> --
> If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
> For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
> visit http://www.lesswatts.org
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ