lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213899342.16752.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:15:42 -0400
From:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To:	wli@...omorphy.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Hugetlb: stop race when reading proc meminfo

minor nit that hugetlb_report_{,node_}meminfo() does not lock the
reading of nr_huge_pages, free_huge_pages, and friends so this is not an
atomic set of information put into the buffer.  If /proc/meminfo is read
while the number of hugetlb pages is in flux it is possible to get
incorrect output such as:

HugePages_Total:     7
HugePages_Free:      8
HugePages_Rsvd:      0
Hugepagesize:     4096 kB

(test available at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309864)

With the patch we beat on a number of boxes for hours with the above
test and saw no inconsistencies in the meminfo output.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>

---

 mm/hugetlb.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index ab17127..fe074d1 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -687,7 +687,9 @@ int hugetlb_overcommit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 
 int hugetlb_report_meminfo(char *buf)
 {
-	return sprintf(buf,
+	int ret;
+	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
+	ret = sprintf(buf,
 			"HugePages_Total: %5lu\n"
 			"HugePages_Free:  %5lu\n"
 			"HugePages_Rsvd:  %5lu\n"
@@ -698,17 +700,23 @@ int hugetlb_report_meminfo(char *buf)
 			resv_huge_pages,
 			surplus_huge_pages,
 			HPAGE_SIZE/1024);
+	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int hugetlb_report_node_meminfo(int nid, char *buf)
 {
-	return sprintf(buf,
+	int ret;
+	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
+	ret = sprintf(buf,
 		"Node %d HugePages_Total: %5u\n"
 		"Node %d HugePages_Free:  %5u\n"
 		"Node %d HugePages_Surp:  %5u\n",
 		nid, nr_huge_pages_node[nid],
 		nid, free_huge_pages_node[nid],
 		nid, surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]);
+	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /* Return the number pages of memory we physically have, in PAGE_SIZE units. */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ