lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806191325s4c10660dt8da146ad2ef4e63b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:25:17 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"Robert Hancock" <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc:	vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, greg@...ah.com,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Strange problem with e1000 driver - ping packet loss

On 6/19/08, Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> wrote:
> Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >        I happened to look at a system which was exhibiting poor ping
> > performance with e1000 driver (in 2.6.25) and had some questions regarding
> that.
> >
> > Ping test was done between the system and a laptop, which were connected
> > using a straight ethernet cable. Ping reported round trip times running
> > into seconds (!) and also packet loss.
> >
> > Upon some investigation, I found that the interrupt count field in
> > /proc/interrupts (associated with eth1) is not incrementing as fast as
> > it should. Moreover eth1 interrupt line is shared with the hard disk
> > interrupt (ata_piix) as below:

Just FYI, it seems that more people have the same (?) problem:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0806.2/0499.html

It might be worth joining forces to fight down the bug once and for
all if it's still not fixed after one and a half years? Sorry, I
really meant error instead of bug.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ