[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080619195240.GX19934@one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:52:40 -0700
From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@...-eyed-alien.net>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dsd@...too.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, vegardno@....uio.no,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] usb-storage: wait for device scanning before mounting root
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:54:19PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > The problem is AFAIU not exactly how many Scsi_Host instances (initiator
> > port representations, or something remotely related to that) are
> > instantiated, but rather _when_ they are instantiated. On multi
> > protocol buses or networks like USB and FireWire, it makes sense to
> > create the SCSI initiator port representation when we discovered that
> > there are actually SCSI targets on the bus or network.
>
> I'm not convinced of that. Why shouldn't we create one scsi host for
> all USB scsi devices? I know that today there's a certain amount of
> per-device state stored in the scsi_host, but that should be fixable.
First, there are usb-storage devices which are USB<->SCSI bridges and
therefore support multiple target devices.
Second, you would still need multiple hosts when you have more than 15
target USB devices, anyway.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
E: You run this ship with Windows?! YOU IDIOT!
L: Give me a break, it came bundled with the computer!
-- ESR and Lan Solaris
User Friendly, 12/8/1998
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists