linux-kernel - Re: "r/o bind mounts" patch in 2.6.26-rc6 changes (breaks?) error behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1213975689.7512.36.camel@nimitz>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:28:09 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@...PERTEmbedded.de>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "r/o bind mounts" patch in 2.6.26-rc6 changes (breaks?) error
	behaviour

On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 07:17 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 12:16 +0200, Jens Rottmann wrote:
> > 
> > I noticed the following change in the error behaviour when attempting
> > to delete nonexisting files/dirs from R/O-mounted directories:
> > 
> > Linux 2.6.25.7:
> > rm /RO_mounted_path/nonexisting_file
> > ==> "No such file or directory"
> > 
> > Linux 2.6.26-rc6-git6:
> > rm /RO_mounted_path/nonexisting_file
> > ==> "Read-only file system"
> 
> We looked at this way back in the beginning when I started to work on
> the patches.  It was decided that the error codes weren't horribly
> important.  We did have a case a bit ago where it really mattered, and
> Al fixed that up.
> 
> I know this changed behavior a bit, but userspace can surely work around
> it with read-only operations (stat) when it is really important to get
> the error to the user just right.

Also, there are some nice benefits to the new way of doing it.  To
figure out if there is a file in that location also requires a path
walk.  Now, that isn't the most expensive thing in the world, but it is
a heck of a lot more expensive than just doing a read-only look at a
variable in the mount (in mnt_want_write()).

Don't you *want* warnings when an 'rm -f' runs into a r/o filesystem? ;)

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/