linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: via-velocity.c fix sleep-with-spinlock bug during MTU change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <485BDFEF.2090307@e-teleport.net>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:50:55 +0200
From:	Séguier Régis <rseguier@...eleport.net>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, alan@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: via-velocity.c fix sleep-with-spinlock bug during
 MTU change

Francois Romieu a écrit :
> Séguier Régis <rseguier@...eleport.net> :
> [...]
>   
>> But if I generate a paquet with a size more than around 3825, the driver 
>> don't send it and no paquet is send after, work again after an interface 
>> down/up and until no paquet > 3825.
>>     
>
> Does it qualify as a regression ?
>
>   
I couldn't say yes now.

To be honest, I never test mtu > 1500 with this driver before.

This can be detected before with the difficulty of mtu change?

I'll test the driver before patch with a bigger MTU. (i'll try to do 
this next week)

-- 
Régis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/