[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080620190714.3435a8e2@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:07:14 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
To: ben@...ff.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: MMC: correct card drivers MODULE_LICENSE() statements
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:07:02 +0100
ben@...ff.org.uk wrote:
> Both the mmc_test and sdio_uart drivers' headers show that
> they are licenses under GPL version 2, but the MODULE_LICENSE
> statements say "GPL". Change the licensing statement to better
> reflect their licensing.
>
This is the same in the entire drivers/mmc subtree. Also, some are v2
only, some are v2 or later. I don't know if there is a consensus on the
naming of these yet. Anyway, it's just used for protecting GPL-only
symbols, so I don't see much point in extending the tag beyond its
current form.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Use end-to-end encryption where
possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists