linux-kernel - Re: [crash, bisected] Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806201336400.16501@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [crash, bisected] Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu
 area

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Mike Travis wrote:

> > Is this a change that only got tested on x86_32?
> 
> I'm only testing this on x86_64.  The zero-based percpu/pda changes worked fine
> up until just recently.  At first it was one of Ingo's "randconfig" config files
> that was tripping it up, but lately it's not working on any config.

x86_32 does not need the zero basing since it does not have a pda.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/