linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] dynamic debug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080618192758.GB4243@ucw.cz>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:27:59 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>
Cc:	'Jason Baron' <jbaron@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com, greg@...ah.com,
	nick@...k-andrew.net, randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] dynamic debug

On Mon 2008-06-16 11:26:12, Takashi Nishiie wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Jason Baron wrote:
> >Each kernel sub-system seems to have its own way of dealing with 
> >debugging statements. Some of these methods include 'dprintk', 
> >'pr_debug', 'dev_debug', 'DEBUGP'. There are also a myriad of 
> >ways of enabling these statements. 
> 
>  I propose to replace 'Pr_debug', 'Dev_debug', and 'DEBUGP' with 
> kernel markers. SystemTap is used for the output of the log.  

...which would make them unusable. You down want people trying to
debug kernel problems install/configure systemtap...

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/