linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1213953776.2336.75.camel@moss.renham>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:22:56 +1000
From:	Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To:	Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@....iitk.ac.in>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for
	configuration based fs?


On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 23:52 -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:19:10PM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> > Looks great, thx :-).  I'll convert some of my stuff over to this
> > interface and see how it flies in the real world.
> 
> 	Excellent.  What is your stuff, btw?  Got code?  Love to see it.

I've done a few things recently.  Haavard Skinnemoen has got an
out-of-tree, avr32-specific gpio interface [1] which I first converted
to the generic gpio framework then completely re-wrote.  Both use
configfs but before either version could reach completion they were
obsoleted by David Brownell's gpio sysfs interface.

A version of my gpio-dev interface is attached.  Bear in mind it was
never completed, it's full of known bugs but hey, might be useful for
you anyway :-)

At the moment I'm experimenting with configfs for pinmux control on
AVR32 SoCs.  There's really nothing to see there yet, it's all just
dicking about atm.

> 
> > ISTR when I did this I kept the old semantics and used ERR_PTR and
> > friends if things went pear-shaped.  Given the small number of in-tree
> > users needing to be moved over, a more intrusive change for the sake of
> > a cleaner API like you've done is probably a good thing anyway :-)
> 
> 	Yeah, I like this better than ERR_PTR.
> 	If you like the macros, I'll try to make the next merge window
> as well.  So let me know.

np, will do :-)

	--Ben.

> 
> joel
> 

[1]
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hskinnemoen/avr32-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/gpio-dev.c;h=8cf6d1182c31db88fc069a046112a4eaac589308;hb=atmel-2.6.25


View attachment "gpio-dev.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (21721 bytes)