[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080620101722.GD17692@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:17:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: Bisecting tip/auto-x86-next?
* Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to track down a problem I reported here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/11/431
[ GART related bootup crash. ]
> None or you were cc'd on the original report because I had no idea of
> the source of the issue. However, I have now narrowed down the
> problem to the auto-x86-next tree. Thus I did something like:
>
> $ git bisect start
> $ git bisect good linus/master
> $ git bisect bad tip/auto-x86-next
ok, in that case you can use tip's topical structure and probably bisect
purely x86/gart, which has all x86 gart changes.
I.e. do something like this:
git-checkout tip/x86/gart
build and boot that kernel, if it fails and mainline works then do:
git-bisect reset
git-bisect start
git-bisect good linus/master
git-bisect bad tip/x86/gart
this should drastically reduce the number of bisection steps needed, to
3 or 4 iterations.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists