linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214010229.2336.88.camel@moss.renham>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:03:49 +1000
From:	Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To:	Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@....iitk.ac.in>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for
	configuration based fs?


On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 14:37 -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 07:22:56PM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> > A version of my gpio-dev interface is attached.  Bear in mind it was
> > never completed, it's full of known bugs but hey, might be useful for
> > you anyway :-)
> 
> 	Looks good.  Fits about what I would expect a configfs interface
> to look like, with simple show/store stuff.  I can see where some macros
> would have shortened some bolierplate.
> 	Was there any other boilerplate you found cumbersome?  I mean
> outside of defining attribute structs and the show/store_attr()
> trampoline functions?  Let me know, so I can incorporate it.
> 

You know, I think you've about covered the boilerplate work.  Apart from
that, well it took me a millisecond to work out what the point of
config_{group,item}s was; I went in kinda expecting to see one struct
for directories and one for attributes.  In fact I still not sure I can
explain the need for config_items separate from config_groups.  Little
help?  :-)

	--Ben.

> Joel
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/