[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806211422g6566027et5ea50445b34177fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:22:09 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v2.6.26-rc7: Negative powertop values
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Arjan van de Ven
<arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:16:37 +0200
> "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
>> I was testing v2.6.26-rc7 by running lmbench and hotplug/-unplugging
>> CPUs and a few other programs at the same time. Powertop was showing a
>> negative number of wakeups/second and average C3 residency was
>> something really insane. Is there anything strange with this schedstat
>> file, or is there another file I should look at that can explain the
>> strange powertop numbers? Or maybe it's just an artifact of powertop
>> and this has nothing to do with the kernel?
>
> powertop doesn't assume you do cpu hotunplug (and the internal state
> goes wacky if you do).
>
Oh right :-) Are there any plans to support this?
> [I assume you know that doing a software unplug you burn more power
> than by leaving the cpu idle]
Well, yeah, this was purely to exercise the kernel a bit, IOW testing.
I guess this can be signed off as a non-kernel issue, then. Thanks for
the quick reply!
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists