[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080621215518.GA5715@damson.getinternet.no>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:55:18 +0200
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Philippe Elie <phil.el@...adoo.fr>
Cc: oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/oprofile: disable preemption in nmi_shutdown
Hi,
Does this look correct? I didn't really play with preemption before, but
as far as I can tell, this is the right thing to do.
I don't really get why model->shutdown(msrs) is done only for one of the
CPUs, but my patch assumes that this is correct. (If that had been done
from inside nmi_shutdown() for each CPU, we wouldn't have had to get the
cpu var, and not needed to disable preemption.)
Please comment :-)
Vegard
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:44:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/oprofile: disable preemption in nmi_shutdown
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: oprofiled/27301
caller is nmi_shutdown+0x11/0x60
Pid: 27301, comm: oprofiled Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7 #25
[<c028a90d>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xbd/0xc0
[<c045fba1>] nmi_shutdown+0x11/0x60
[<c045dd4a>] oprofile_shutdown+0x2a/0x60
Note that we don't need this for the other functions, since they are all
called with on_each_cpu() (which disables preemption for us anyway).
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
index cc48d3f..4a177b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
@@ -269,12 +269,16 @@ static void nmi_cpu_shutdown(void *dummy)
static void nmi_shutdown(void)
{
- struct op_msrs *msrs = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_msrs);
+ struct op_msrs *msrs;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ msrs = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_msrs);
nmi_enabled = 0;
on_each_cpu(nmi_cpu_shutdown, NULL, 0, 1);
unregister_die_notifier(&profile_exceptions_nb);
model->shutdown(msrs);
free_msrs();
+ preempt_enable();
}
static void nmi_cpu_start(void *dummy)
--
1.5.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists