[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806211651210.2926@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
bfields@...ldses.org, neilb@...e.de, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc: nfsd hangs for a few sec
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> Not a direct explanation for the problem but the memory wastage could
> certainly can heretofore undiscovered locking dependencies to be
> exposed.
Well, not for these traces, no. The trace contains __slab_alloc() in the
call chain, which definitely fingers SLUB, not slab, despite the name
(slab calls its allocation routines "cache_alloc", while slub calls them
"slab_alloc" ;)
So the patch looks fine, and I applied it, but as Mel already mentioned,
it looks like it won't be making any difference for Alexander.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists