[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485CB652.90801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:35:38 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Priority heap infrastructure enhancements
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Some of the common code has been factored into heap_adjust() a.k.a heapify
>> in data structures terminology.
>>
>> I am sending out this patch indepedent of the memory controller changes as
>> they deserve to be reviewed independently.
>>
>> One limitation of the current heap_insert() routine is that it does not
>> insert an element which is greater than the root, when the heap slots
>> are fully used. I'll work on and review that interface and find a suitable
>> way to address that issue
>
> How else would you want it to behave? If you have a fixed size heap
> and it's full, then you have to drop the largest value. (Well, you
> could in theory drop the smallest value, but there's no quick way to
> find that.)
>
I would like to be able to drop the smallest value. Since we cannot drop the
smallest value, dropping a leaf (heap->size) should be sufficiently good enough.
I want a max heap and losing the root of the heap does not work for me.
>> Comments, Flames? Please do review closely!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Looks fine.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Thanks for the review!
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists