linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] dynamic debug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080621081735.GA11929@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:17:35 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	joe@...ches.com, nick@...k-andrew.net, randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dynamic debug - core infrastructure

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:38:22AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:08:12AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > > @@ -595,6 +595,22 @@ extern const char *dev_driver_string(struct device *dev);
> > >  #ifdef DEBUG
> > >  #define dev_dbg(dev, format, arg...)		\
> > >  	dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG , dev , format , ## arg)
> > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PRINTK_DEBUG)
> > > +#define dev_dbg(dev, format, ...) do {				    	     \
> > > +	static char mod_name[]						     \
> > > +	__attribute__((section("__verbose_strings")))			     \
> > > +	 = KBUILD_MODNAME;						     \
> > > +	static struct mod_debug foobar					     \
> > > +	__used								     \
> > > +	__attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) =		     \
> > > +	{ mod_name, mod_name, "0", "0", NULL };				     \
> > 
> > Does the compiler merge all of these variables together into one within
> > the same file?
> > 
> 
> no.
> 
> > If not, should we have a new macro, one per file, for this information?
> > 
> 
> With this feature enabled, the above 'meta-data' added ~32K to the .init.data
> section. This memory is freed when the system boots because it is placed in the
> .init.data section. The same is true for modules, the 'meta-data' is freed when
> the module loads.
> 
> We could reduce the vmlinux by having 'register()' type calls for this
> infrastructure, or a new marco per file as you suggest, and i had something
> like that in an earlier iteration, but I think the memory savings is very
> small when compared to the increased complexity. The simplicity to just put a
> 'pr_debug()" anywhere and just have it do the right thing is nice.
> 
> Also, it should be noted that the total increase in the size of the 'vmlinux' 
> was 3%, or 2M, this is due to the above 'meta-data', the new code, and probably 
> most significantly, the strings, for the additinal printks. Thus, compressing
> the above meta-data, or eliminating it by some other means would only decrease
> the size of this infrastructure by 2% or so.

Ok, thanks for the good explaination.  As long as there is a way to turn
this off for the EMBEDDED people who do care about 2% at times, this
should be ok.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/