[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080622175928.GA5022@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:59:28 +0400
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 01:11:35PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Tracepoint proposal
>
> - Tracepoint infrastructure
> - In-kernel users
> - Complete typing, verified by the compiler
> - Dynamically linked and activated
>
> - Marker infrastructure
> - Exported API to userland
> - Basic types only
>
> - Dynamic vs static
> - In-kernel probes are dynamically linked, dynamically activated, connected to
> tracepoints. Type verification is done at compile-time. Those in-kernel
> probes can be a probe extracting the information to put in a marker or a
> specific in-kernel tracer such as ftrace.
> - Information sinks (LTTng, SystemTAP) are dynamically connected to the
> markers inserted in the probes and are dynamically activated.
>
> - Near instrumentation site vs in a separate tracer module
>
> A probe module, only if provided with the kernel tree, could connect to internal
> tracing sites. This argues for keeping the tracepoing probes near the
> instrumentation site code. However, if a tracer is general purpose and exports
> typing information to userspace through some mechanism, it should only export
> the "basic type" information and could be therefore shipped outside of the
> kernel tree.
>
> In-kernel probes should be integrated to the kernel tree. They would be close to
> the instrumented kernel code and would translate between the in-kernel
> instrumentation and the "basic type" exports. Other in-kernel probes could
> provide a different output (statistics available through debugfs for instance).
> ftrace falls into this category.
>
> Generic or specialized information "sinks" (LTTng, systemtap) could be connected
> to the markers put in tracepoint probes to extract the information to userspace.
> They would extract both typing information and the per-tracepoint execution
> information to userspace.
>
> Therefore, the code would look like :
>
> kernel/sched.c:
>
> #include "sched-trace.h"
>
> schedule()
> {
> ...
> trace_sched_switch(prev, next);
> ...
> }
Once this is accepted you're going to add hundreds of such calls to every
core subsystem, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists