linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Better interface for hooking early initcalls.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:43:55 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu" <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Cc:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, tzanussi@...il.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	compudj@...stal.dyndns.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Better interface for hooking early initcalls.

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
<eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro> wrote:
> Will do, good idea. However, I feel like these should be two different
> patches. The first adds the new interface, the second converts existing
> users to the new interface. Will resubmit the patch series soon, along
> with the conversion patch.

By the way -- may I ask why it is called early_initcall() and not
pre_smp_initcall()? I think it makes sense to encode the exact purpose
of the initcall into the name. "early" is not very explicit. This is
just my opinion :-) Thanks.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/