[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806221343o3a9e3951j1448e968f9ba9684@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:43:55 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu" <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Cc: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, tzanussi@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
compudj@...stal.dyndns.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Better interface for hooking early initcalls.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
<eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro> wrote:
> Will do, good idea. However, I feel like these should be two different
> patches. The first adds the new interface, the second converts existing
> users to the new interface. Will resubmit the patch series soon, along
> with the conversion patch.
By the way -- may I ask why it is called early_initcall() and not
pre_smp_initcall()? I think it makes sense to encode the exact purpose
of the initcall into the name. "early" is not very explicit. This is
just my opinion :-) Thanks.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists