| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6278d2220806221356o4c611e43n305ec9653d6d5359@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:56:17 +0100
From: "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: "Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dgc@....com
Subject: Re: [2.6.26-rc7] shrink_icache from pagefault locking (nee: nfsd hangs for a few sec)...
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:10:11 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
>
>> On (22/06/08 10:58), Daniel J Blueman didst pronounce:
>> > I'm seeing a similar issue [2] to what was recently reported [1] by
>> > Alexander, but with another workload involving XFS and memory
>> > pressure.
>> >
>>
>> Is NFS involved or is this XFS only? It looks like XFS-only but no
>> harm in being sure.
>>
>> I'm beginning to wonder if this is a problem where a lot of dirty
>> inodes are being written back in this path and we stall while that
>> happens. I'm still not getting why we are triggering this now and did
>> not before 2.6.26-rc1 or why it bisects to the zonelist
>> modifications. Diffing the reclaim and allocation paths between
>> 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc1 has not yielded any candidates for me yet that
>> would explain this.
>
> this sort of thing can easily be exposed with the latencytop tool...
> it will at least tell you WHAT the system is blocking on.
> (not so much the why, the tool isn't smart enough to automatically spit
> out kernel patches yet)
Good plan. I reproduced this without NFS mounted, so pure XFS. I
wasn't able to capture the same process's (ie 5480) latencytop trace,
but it may have contributed to the list.
A fair amount of debugging was turned on, hurting the latency some
(despite it being a 3.6GHz Penryn).
Daniel
--- [1]
$ vmstat 1
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
<snip>
1 1 156 14424 12 2329672 0 0 0 110755 177 3820 57 6 36 0
2 1 156 14736 12 2348152 0 0 24 25172 204 26018 35 21 43 1
5 0 156 24252 12 2363800 0 0 59656 31 545 25292 35 14 28 23
4 0 156 14696 12 2317784 0 0 3824 0 38 23083 95 6 0 0
4 0 156 14440 12 2319304 0 0 4672 0 72 3372 93 3 3 2
2 0 156 14428 12 2318484 0 0 0 4 27 731 52 0 49 0
2 0 156 14480 12 2308512 0 0 0 12 32 36629 39 13 49 0
2 0 156 14572 12 2301220 0 0 3904 12316 117 10760 58 7 26 11
--- [2]
Cause Maximum Percentage
down xfs_buf_lock _xfs_buf_find xfs_buf_get_flags 271.1 msec 0.4 %
down xfs_buf_iowait xfs_buf_iostart xfs_buf_read_f206.1 msec 1.3 %
down xfs_buf_lock xfs_getsb xfs_trans_getsb xfs_tr160.4 msec 0.5 %
sync_page sync_page_killable __lock_page_killable 155.3 msec 26.1 %
down xfs_buf_iowait xfs_buf_iostart xfs_buf_read_f101.6 msec 0.6 %
down xfs_buf_iowait xfs_buf_iostart xfs_buf_read_f 99.1 msec 0.7 %
sync_page __lock_page find_lock_page filemap_fault 84.0 msec 1.5 %
down xfs_buf_iowait xfs_buf_iostart xfs_buf_read_f 70.8 msec 0.4 %
sync_buffer __wait_on_buffer __block_prepare_write 66.4 msec 0.1 %
o_sync_readv_writev do_readv_writev vfs_writev
Process AutopanoPro (4697) Total: 4693.4 msec
down xfs_buf_lock xfs_getsb xfs_trans_getsb xfs_tr126.2 msec
2.7 %trans_commit xfs_create xfs_vn_mknod xfs_vn_create vfs_create
do_filp_open do_sys_open
sync_page sync_page_killable __lock_page_killable 89.3 msec
15.3 %_read __xfs_file_read xfs_file_aio_read do_sync_read vfs_read
sys_read system_call_after
down xfs_buf_iowait xfs_buf_iostart xfs_buf_read_f 88.5 msec
2.2 %fs_da_do_buf xfs_da_read_buf xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int
xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup xfs_dir_looku
Scheduler: waiting for cpu 49.4 msec 77.7 %
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.8 msec
1.4 %e_fault error_exit
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.4 msec
0.4 %ead ondemand_readahead page_cache_async_readahead
generic_file_aio_read xfs_read __xfs_f
ile_read xfs_file_aio_read do_sync_read vfs_read
--- [3]
Cause Maximum Percentage
sync_page sync_page_killable __lock_page_killable 103.9 msec 36.5 %
Scheduler: waiting for cpu 37.0 msec 49.5 %
sync_page __lock_page find_lock_page filemap_fault 28.6 msec 1.2 %
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.5 msec 1.3 %
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.2 msec 0.4 %
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.2 msec 0.4 %
do_page_fault error_exit d do_sync_read vfs_read 11.6 msec 0.5 %
sys_mmap system_call_after_swapgs 7.8 msec 0.2 %
do_select core_sys_select sys_select system_call_a 4.9 msec 8.1 %
Process AutopanoPro (4697) Total: 977.5 msec
sync_page sync_page_killable __lock_page_killable 97.7 msec
76.6 %_read __xfs_file_read xfs_file_aio_read do_sync_read vfs_read
sys_read system_call_after
sync_page __lock_page find_lock_page filemap_fault 28.6 msec
5.6 %lt do_page_fault error_exit
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.5 msec
2.0 %e_fault error_exit
congestion_wait __alloc_pages_internal __alloc_pag 19.2 msec
2.0 %k_write_begin xfs_vm_write_begin generic_file_buffered_write
xfs_write __xfs_file_write
Scheduler: waiting for cpu_write vfs_write 16.5 msec 8.7 %
do_page_fault error_exit 11.6 msec 2.3 %
--- [4]
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.26-rc7-211c #2
-------------------------------------------------------
AutopanoPro/5480 is trying to acquire lock:
(iprune_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802d2a5d>] shrink_icache_memory+0x7d/0x280
but task is already holding lock:
(&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<ffffffff803a459f>]
xfs_ilock+0xbf/0x110
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}:
[<ffffffff802769ad>] __lock_acquire+0xbdd/0x1020
[<ffffffff80276e55>] lock_acquire+0x65/0x90
[<ffffffff8026b41b>] down_write_nested+0x4b/0x90
[<ffffffff803a45df>] xfs_ilock+0xff/0x110
[<ffffffff803a47af>] xfs_ireclaim+0x3f/0x90
[<ffffffff803c9169>] xfs_finish_reclaim+0x59/0x220
[<ffffffff803cc3b5>] xfs_reclaim+0x185/0x190
[<ffffffff803d9211>] xfs_fs_clear_inode+0xe1/0x130
[<ffffffff802d25c7>] clear_inode+0x87/0x120
[<ffffffff802d290a>] dispose_list+0x2a/0x100
[<ffffffff802d2c06>] shrink_icache_memory+0x226/0x280
[<ffffffff8029d9c5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
[<ffffffff8029dc52>] try_to_free_pages+0x232/0x360
[<ffffffff80297f0d>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x1ed/0x4a0
[<ffffffff802981db>] __alloc_pages+0xb/0x10
[<ffffffff802a312a>] handle_mm_fault+0x46a/0x6d0
[<ffffffff8060510a>] do_page_fault+0x3ca/0x830
[<ffffffff80602add>] error_exit+0x0/0xa9
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
-> #0 (iprune_mutex){--..}:
[<ffffffff80276817>] __lock_acquire+0xa47/0x1020
[<ffffffff80276e55>] lock_acquire+0x65/0x90
[<ffffffff8060059a>] mutex_lock_nested+0xba/0x2b0
[<ffffffff802d2a5d>] shrink_icache_memory+0x7d/0x280
[<ffffffff8029d9c5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
[<ffffffff8029dc52>] try_to_free_pages+0x232/0x360
[<ffffffff80297f0d>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x1ed/0x4a0
[<ffffffff802981db>] __alloc_pages+0xb/0x10
[<ffffffff8029a6b6>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x136/0x230
[<ffffffff8029aa08>] ondemand_readahead+0x128/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8029ab45>] page_cache_async_readahead+0x75/0xa0
[<ffffffff80293a8a>] generic_file_aio_read+0x28a/0x610
[<ffffffff803d78c4>] xfs_read+0x124/0x270
[<ffffffff803d4416>] __xfs_file_read+0x46/0x50
[<ffffffff803d4451>] xfs_file_aio_read+0x11/0x20
[<ffffffff802bc1b1>] do_sync_read+0xf1/0x130
[<ffffffff802bca74>] vfs_read+0xc4/0x160
[<ffffffff802bcf10>] sys_read+0x50/0x90
[<ffffffff8022639b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by AutopanoPro/5480:
#0: (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<ffffffff803a459f>]
xfs_ilock+0xbf/0x110
#1: (shrinker_rwsem){----}, at: [<ffffffff8029d8d2>] shrink_slab+0x32/0x180
stack backtrace:
Pid: 5480, comm: AutopanoPro Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7-211c #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80274293>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x83/0x90
[<ffffffff80276817>] __lock_acquire+0xa47/0x1020
[<ffffffff8027588f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x150
[<ffffffff80276e55>] lock_acquire+0x65/0x90
[<ffffffff802d2a5d>] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x7d/0x280
[<ffffffff8060059a>] mutex_lock_nested+0xba/0x2b0
[<ffffffff802d2a5d>] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x7d/0x280
[<ffffffff80602915>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x55/0x60
[<ffffffff802d2a5d>] shrink_icache_memory+0x7d/0x280
[<ffffffff8029d8d2>] ? shrink_slab+0x32/0x180
[<ffffffff8029d9c5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
[<ffffffff8029dc52>] try_to_free_pages+0x232/0x360
[<ffffffff8029c570>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x40
[<ffffffff80297f0d>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x1ed/0x4a0
[<ffffffff802981db>] __alloc_pages+0xb/0x10
[<ffffffff8029a6b6>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x136/0x230
[<ffffffff8029aa08>] ondemand_readahead+0x128/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8029ab45>] page_cache_async_readahead+0x75/0xa0
[<ffffffff80293a8a>] generic_file_aio_read+0x28a/0x610
[<ffffffff803d78c4>] xfs_read+0x124/0x270
[<ffffffff803d4416>] __xfs_file_read+0x46/0x50
[<ffffffff803d4451>] xfs_file_aio_read+0x11/0x20
[<ffffffff802bc1b1>] do_sync_read+0xf1/0x130
[<ffffffff802673f0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[<ffffffff8022ce57>] ? native_sched_clock+0x57/0x80
[<ffffffff802bda68>] ? fget_light+0xe8/0x100
[<ffffffff80272dea>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x5a/0x80
[<ffffffff802bca74>] vfs_read+0xc4/0x160
[<ffffffff802bcf10>] sys_read+0x50/0x90
[<ffffffff8022639b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists