[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080623123344.0c16ed69@kopernikus.site>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:33:44 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> [2008-06-23 10:09]:
>
> | commit 91d48fc80f22817332170082e10de60a75851640
> | Author: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
> | Date: Sun Jun 8 15:46:29 2008 +0200
> | CommitDate: Tue Jun 10 14:41:56 2008 +0200
> |
> | bootmem: add return value to reserve_bootmem_node()
> |
> | This patch changes the function reserve_bootmem_node() from void to
> | int, returning -ENOMEM if the allocation fails.
> |
> | Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
> | Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> so it is a -stable candidate just as much as the kexec fix. (These are
> all fixes for long-standing problems so i guess it can go all the way
> back to all stable kernels that are being maintained.)
Ingo,
shouldn't we add the reserve_bootmem_generic() fix [1] to 2.6.26-* at
least?
Bernhard
[1] 62b5ebe062c2801f6d40480ae3b91a64c8c8e6cb
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists