[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485F8822.5030205@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:25:22 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sct@...hat.com, adilger@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jack@...e.cz, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write
error
A transient I/O error can corrupt inode data. Here is the scenario:
(1) update inode_A at the block_B
(2) pdflush writes out new inode_A to the filesystem, but it results
in write I/O error, at this point, BH_Uptodate flag of the buffer
for block_B is cleared and BH_Write_EIO is set
(3) create new inode_C which located at block_B, and
__ext3_get_inode_loc() tries to read on-disk block_B because the
buffer is not uptodate
(4) if it can read on-disk block_B successfully, inode_A is
overwritten by old data
This patch makes __ext3_get_inode_loc() not read the inode block if
the buffer has BH_Write_EIO flag. In this case, the buffer should
have the latest information, so setting the uptodate flag to the
buffer (this avoids WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_buffer_dirty().)
According to this change, we would need to test BH_Write_EIO flag for
the error checking. Currently nobody checks write I/O errors on
metadata buffers, but it will be done in other patches I'm working on.
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
---
fs/ext3/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/fs/ext3/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -2516,6 +2516,16 @@ static int __ext3_get_inode_loc(struct i
}
if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
lock_buffer(bh);
+
+ /*
+ * If the buffer has the write error flag, we have failed
+ * to write out another inode in the same block. In this
+ * case, we don't have to read the block because we may
+ * read the old inode data successfully.
+ */
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+
if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
/* someone brought it uptodate while we waited */
unlock_buffer(bh);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists