[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080623113422.GA20419@linuxtv.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:34:22 +0200
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:08:23AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Zero is not a valid IRQ in the kernel mapping of things. If you have a
> physical IRQ 0 remap it.
I'm confused. On my Thinkpad with kernel 2.6.25 I get:
$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 4398925 XT-PIC-XT timer
1: 287065 XT-PIC-XT i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC-XT cascade
...
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists