[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080624021120.2bcca593.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:11:20 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: eranian@...glemail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 05/19] perfmon2 minimal v2: X86 generic code
Hi Stephane,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:02:22 -0700 (PDT) eranian@...glemail.com wrote:
>
> This patch adds the X86 generic perfmon2 code. It is in charge of
> implementing certain key functionalities required by the generic
> code such as read/write of the PMU registers, low-level interrupt
> handling.
After applying patches 1-5, building an x86_64 allmodconfig produces
these errors:
In file included from include/linux/perfmon_kern.h:167,
from arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c:25:
include/linux/perfmon_pmu.h:92: warning: ‘struct pfarg_pmc’ declared inside parameter list
include/linux/perfmon_pmu.h:92: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
include/linux/perfmon_pmu.h:96: warning: ‘struct pfarg_pmd’ declared inside parameter list
Those structures aren't defined until patch 11.
In file included from arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c:25:
include/linux/perfmon_kern.h: In function ‘pfm_copy_thread’:
include/linux/perfmon_kern.h:199: error: ‘TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW’ undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c: In function ‘smp_pmu_interrupt’:
arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c:338: error: ‘LOCAL_PERFMON_VECTOR’ undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c: In function ‘pfm_arch_resend_irq’:
arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c:451: error: ‘LOCAL_PERFMON_VECTOR’ undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c: In function ‘pfm_arch_pmu_acquire_percpu’:
arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon.c:475: error: ‘LOCAL_PERFMON_VECTOR’ undeclared (first use in this function)
These are not defined until patch 7.
So I think some rearrangement is still required.
Also, some of the x86 files that you are modifying have had their 32 and
64 bit versions combined in linux-next (which is the stuff of the next
merge window) so just a heads up that there will be more merge work then.
Lastly, some of this will clash with the generic IPIs work.
I don't want to put you off, you have done great work here, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists