[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485FF44C.4010600@csr.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:06:52 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AntonioLin <antonio.lin@...ormicro.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Scatter-gather list constraints
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, David Vrabel wrote:
>
>> Note that this 1024 byte multiple is for one particular WUSB mass
>> storage device. The WUSB standard permits max packet sizes of up 3584
>> (in multiples of 512), but I suspect WUSB mass storage devices will only
>> use 512, 1024, or 2048.
>>
>> For a solution, we may be able to do something if the HWA host
>> controller is passed a single URB with an s-g list (rather than one URB
>> per s-g list entry) and was careful about how it segmented the URB into
>> transfers to the rpipe.
>
> That would be ideal. However there is no way to pass an S-G list along
> with an URB; there's no field for it in the data structure. And none
> of the existing host controller drivers support such a thing.
>
> I suppose we could add a field to struct urb and add a flag indicating
> whether the controller driver supports S-G lists.
This is what I was thinking.
Can the number of entries in a sg list be limited? e.g., if the
hardware only had support for say, 64 entries?
David
--
David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers
CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562
Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists