[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806232112.30393.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:12:30 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@...r list
On Monday 23 June 2008 20:57, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > I agree. And if we do want to pay attention to pure code size, there are
> > > other approaches -- like --gc-sections
> >
> > I have some patches in this area too. Were submitted to Sam
> > but he was too busy it seems.
>
> They were not trivial to apply and so went down on the TODO list.
I realize that they were not trivial to review, but that
was unavoidable. They were even more not trivial to create.
> We could try to push the generic and x86 specific .lds stuff via
> the arch maintainers?
IIRC I splitted the entire GC collection patch in a way
that first patches were doing exactly this easier first part
and I hoped that at least these first patches
will be taken. They were big, but somewhat trivial,
from "it's obviously safe" department.
Had they been applied, now making --gc-sections to work
would be easier.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists