[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080623192012.GA15183@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:20:12 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>, stable@...nel.org,
Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:09:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > You will also need the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/21/103 to
> > > > make sure reserve_bootmem() is not void (*)().
> > >
> > > Ok, let me know when that goes into Linus's tree please.
> >
> > It already is: 71c2742f5e6348d76ee62085cf0a13e5eff0f00e.
Thanks, I'll go add that one as well.
> thanks. This patch (which was not a build fix but an infrastructure fix
> that the kexec fix in arch/x86 depended on) is well-tested as well, it
> was queued in -tip on June 10th:
>
> | commit 91d48fc80f22817332170082e10de60a75851640
> | Author: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
> | Date: Sun Jun 8 15:46:29 2008 +0200
> | CommitDate: Tue Jun 10 14:41:56 2008 +0200
> |
> | bootmem: add return value to reserve_bootmem_node()
> |
> | This patch changes the function reserve_bootmem_node() from void to
> | int, returning -ENOMEM if the allocation fails.
> |
> | Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
> | Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> so it is a -stable candidate just as much as the kexec fix. (These are
> all fixes for long-standing problems so i guess it can go all the way
> back to all stable kernels that are being maintained.)
Hm, but it's not in Linus's tree yet, so I can't take it for stable at
this time :(
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists