[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1214251591.8011.273.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:06:31 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 04:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 23 June 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > NO_IRQ on x86 is 0
>
> There is no such #define for it.
> And since zero is used for timer IRQs, it's not invalid.
I'll refer you to past discussions with Linus here. 0 is invalid to
drivers for all intend and purposes.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists