[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080623214359.GA16851@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:43:59 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
jmforbes@...uxtx.org, zwane@....linux.org.uk, tytso@....edu,
rdunlap@...otime.net, davej@...hat.com, chuckw@...ntumlinux.com,
reviews@...cw.f00f.org, mkrufky@...uxtv.org, cebbert@...hat.com,
cavokz@...il.com, w@....eu, rbranco@...checkpoint.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 3/5] sctp: Make sure N * sizeof(union sctp_addr) does
not overflow.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:36:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:28:47 -0700
>
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:23:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
> > > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:01:36 -0700
> > >
> > > > 2.6.25-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us
> > > > know.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, Vlad found another case in SCTP which has
> > > an overflow bug similar to this one. I'll work on a
> > > fix for that today and submit.
> >
> > Thanks for letting me know, I'll wait for that one as well before doing
> > this release.
>
> This one turned out to be a false alarm, and Vlad confirmed my
> analysis today. So there is no other SCTP patch you need to
> wait for.
Great, thanks for letting me know.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists