linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:51:41 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with
	preempt-able hardirqs


* Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:

> IDE interrupt handler relies on the fact that, if necessary, hardirqs 
> will re-trigger on ISR exit. With fully preemtable IRQs this seems to 
> be not true, since if hardirq thread is currently running, and the 
> same IRQ raised again, then this IRQ will be simply lost.

actually no, that should not happen - if -rt loses an IRQ then something 
broke in the threaded IRQ code. It's supposed to be a drop-in, 
compatible IRQ flow with no driver changes needed.

( also, please do not Cc: mainline maintainers to RFC -rt patches, let
  the -rt maintainers sort out the need for any patch propagation - once 
  the patches are sufficiently cooked. Thanks. )

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/