[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485E00CD.9060503@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:35:41 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: nanosleep() uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC, should be CLOCK_REALTIME?
Thomas,
(I gues you are the right target for this?)
The POSIX.1 specification of nanosleep() says:
But, except for the case of being interrupted by a signal, the
suspension time shall not be less than the time specified by
rqtp, as measured by the system clock CLOCK_REALTIME.
However, reading kernel/hrtimer.c:sys_nanosleep(), it appears that
CLOCK_MONOTONIC is used.
return hrtimer_nanosleep(&tu, rmtp, HRTIMER_MODE_REL, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
Is there a reason to use CLOCK_MONOTONIC, instead of CLOCK_REALTIME? Is it
intentional? If yes, then I should document this in the man-pages. If not,
then it should be fixed.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
man-pages onlne: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists