lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080624063606.GE6239@webber.adilger.int>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:36:06 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To:	Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sct@...hat.com, adilger@...sterfs.com,
	Sami Liedes <sliedes@...hut.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: validate directory entry data before use

On Jun 21, 2008  02:54 +0100, Duane Griffin wrote:
> Various places in fs/ext3/namei.c use ext3_next_entry to loop over
> directory entries, but not all of them verify that entries are valid before
> attempting to move to the next one. In the case where rec_len == 0 this
> causes an infinite loop.
> 
> Introduce a new version of ext3_next_entry that checks the validity of the
> entry before using its data to find the next one. Rename the original
> function to __ext3_next_entry and use it in places where we already know
> the data is valid.
>
> Note that the changes to empty_dir follow the original code in reporting
> the directory as empty in the presence of errors.
> 
> This patch fixes the first case (image hdb.25.softlockup.gz) reported in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10882.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
> --
> 
> Please note that I've only properly tested the originally reported failure
> case (i.e. the changes to ext3_dx_find_entry).
> 
> Reviewers may want to pay particular attention to the changes to do_split,
> make_indexed_dir and empty_dir. I've tried to follow the original code's
> error handling conventions, as noted above for empty_dir, but I'm not sure
> this is the best way to do things.

Just as a note, and not to detract from the validity of this patch -
in the ext2 page-based directory code is somewhat more efficient in this
area.  It checks each page a single time when it is first read from disk,
marks the page as checked, and then never has to check the page again.

This wasn't implemented for ext3 because it never changed from buffer-
based directories to page-based directories due to the dependence on
buffer heads for the journaling code.

It would be possible to implement this for ext3/ext4 readdir/lookup by
replacing use of ext3_bread() with a new ext3_bread_dir() - a copy of
ext3_bread() that validates the buffer if it actually needs ll_rw_block()
to read the buffer from disk.

I also note in ext3_readdir() for non-indexed directories that the readahead
doesn't check for !buffer_uptodate(bh) before forcing a read of the next
block.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ